A novel open synovectomy technique using an arthroscopy shaver blade in revision surgery to treat infected total knee arthroplasty: a technical note.

BACKGROUND: This article introduces a novel open synovectomy technique using an arthroscopy shaver blade to effectively remove intra-articular synovitis during revision surgery for infected primary total knee arthroplasty. METHODS (TECHNIQUES): Open synovectomy is performed using a 4.2-mm arthroscopy shaver blade, and the handpiece is connected to suction drainage. Suction is supplied through the central cylinder of the shaver blade to bring the debrided fragments of soft tissue into the window. Grossly inflamed, reddened, diseased synovium is debrided to reveal yellowish, healthy synovium. The inflamed tissues of the knee joint (suprapatellar pouch, medial and lateral gutters, and peripatellar area) are debrided. Then, with maintaining full flexion of the knee joint, a shaver equipped with a longer bar can be used to easily access the medial and lateral posterior compartments, which are generally difficult to access. RESULTS: During a mean of 13.5-month follow-up, there was no recurrent infection in either group; however, patients who underwent the novel technique improved significantly faster in terms of acute serological markers during the first period. CONCLUSIONS: This technique yielded favorable outcomes compared with the conventional technique. In particular, it may facilitate the approach to the posterior joint space, which is difficult to access.

Screening complications in the postoperative period of orthopedic surgeries by video arthroscopy

To analyze the prevalence and characteristics of late postoperative complications of orthopedic surgeries by video arthroscopy.This was a descriptive cross-sectional study that evaluated, through its own instrument, local and systemic postoperative complications of patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries by video arthroscopy. The study included 270 patients, who were evaluated on days 30(without prosthesis) and 90(with prosthesis placement) of the postoperative period, by telephone service. The selection of participants occurred sequentially and population-based, within the data collection period, from February to July 2020, in a large hospital for medium and high complexity surgeries. Of the 270 procedures performed in the period, 4.4% (n = 12) presented late postoperative infection. The most frequent complications were erythema (83%), edema (75%) and secretion (67%) in the surgical wound. Most used antibiotic therapy (92%) and anti-inflammatory drugs (67%). Hospital readmission was not necessary concerning the complications. Only 50% required medical evaluation before the scheduled time.The need for practices that ensure the quality of perioperative care and improve the active search to assess surgical outcomes is reinforced.

Will rheumatologists ever pick up the arthroscope again?

Conditions prompting physicians and surgeons first adapting endoscopes to peer into joints were mainly the sort of synovial conditions that would concern today's rheumatologists. Rheumatologists were among the pre-World War II pioneers developing and documenting arthroscopy. The post-War father of modern arthroscopy, Watanabe, found rheumatologists among his early students, who took back the technique to their home countries, teaching orthopedists and rheumatologists alike. Rheumatologists described and analyzed the intra-articular features of their common diseases in the '60s and '70s. A groundswell of interest from academic rheumatologists in adapting arthroscopy grew considerably in the '90s with development of "needle scopes" that could be used in an office setting. Rheumatologists helped conduct the very trials the findings of which reduced demand for their arthroscopic services by questioning the efficacy of arthroscopic debridement in osteoarthritis (OA) and also developing biological compounds that greatly reduced the call for any resective intervention in inflammatory arthropathies. The arthroscope has proven an excellent tool for viewing and sampling synovium and continues to serve this purpose at several international research centers. While cartilage is now imaged mainly by magnetic resonance imaging, some OA features - such as a high prevalence of visible calcinosis - beg further arthroscopy-directed investigation. A new generation of "needle scopes" with far superior optics awaits future investigators, should they develop interest.

Therapeutic efficacy of arthroscopy-assisted transosseous fixation with the Versalok suture anchor for tibial eminence fractures in adults.

ABSTRACT: To investigate the clinical outcomes of arthroscopy-assisted transosseous fixation of tibial eminence fractures with the Versalok suture anchor in adults.A total of 23 adult cases of tibial eminence fractures treated between June 2016 and March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The results of the preoperative drawer test and Lachman test were positive. Radiography and computed tomography were performed before and after the procedure. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in every patient after admission. Arthroscopy-assisted fracture reduction and Orthocord high-strength suture fixation with two Versalok anchors were performed in all the patients. The International Knee Documentation Committee scale and the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale were used to evaluate outcomes during the follow-up period. Additionally, the KT-2000 knee stability test was performed.At the final follow-up, all the fractures had proceeded to bony union and no wound infection was observed. The average Lysholm Knee Score of the affected knees was 93.1 (range, 90-98), which was not significantly different from that of the healthy knees (t = 0.732, P = .132). Based on the International Knee Documentation Committee scale results, 21 patients were graded as normal and the other 2 patients were graded as nearly normal. The KT-2000 test showed that the anterior displacement of the affected side and the healthy side was less than 3.6 mm in all cases.The outcomes indicated firm fixation and good fracture healing with minimal trauma. Thus, arthroscopy-assisted transosseous fixation with Versalok suture anchors for adult tibial eminence fractures seems to have satisfactory clinical outcomes.

Knee Flexion-induced Translation of Pullout Sutures Used in the Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears.

Medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) have recently attracted considerable interest in orthopedics. To date, no in vivo human study has investigated suture translation changes in repaired MMPRTs with different degrees of knee flexion. This study examined suture translation at various degrees of knee flexion in 30 patients undergoing medial meniscus posterior root repair using the modified Mason-Allen suture technique between August 2016 and September 2017. Intraoperatively, sutures were provisionally fixed to an isometric positioner at the tibial site of the desired meniscal attachment, and the suture translation was measured at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. The results showed significant increases in mean suture translation at the knee flexion positions from 0° to 30°, 30° to 60°, and 60° to 90° (p<0.01 for all). Our findings indicate that surgeons should carefully assess the degree of knee flexion at the moment when the meniscus is refixed by surgical sutures.

Evaluation of hip arthroscopy using a hip-specific distractor for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Hip arthroscopy using an orthopaedic traction table has been associated with traction-related neurovascular complications. Since the use of a hip-specific distractor for performing hip arthroscopy hasn't been associated with those specific complications we hypothesized that a hip-specific distractor might facilitate the learning curve of hip arthroscopy for beginner surgeons. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively the first 56 hip arthroscopies performed to treat femoro-acetabular impingement using a hip-specific distractor. We tried to analyse the learning curve of this procedure using operative time, peri- and postoperative complications, hospital stay and patient satisfaction. We also evaluated pre- and postoperative sports activities and tried to identify some factors as poor postoperative prognostic factors. RESULTS: Only 1 major complication occurred. No traction-related complications have been encountered. The curves analysing intervention time and postoperative satisfaction rate showed improvement after 30 cases performed. In all cases, we were able to perform the whole planned gesture without difficulties accessing the hip joint. CONCLUSION: The hip-specific distractor is a safe and reproducible method in performing hip arthroscopy without any traction-related complications or time limits.

All-suture anchors versus metal suture anchors in the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability: A comparison of mid-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare metal suture anchors and all-suture anchors clinically and radiologically in arthroscopic Bankart repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 67 patients (61 males, 6 females; mean age 26.0±5.8; range, 18 to 43 years) who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair between April 2009 and October 2016 were divided into two groups depending on the type of the suture anchor used in different periods. Group A comprised 32 patients with arthroscopic Bankart repair performed with metal suture anchors, and Group B comprised 35 patients with arthroscopic Bankart repair performed with all-suture anchors. The patients were clinically evaluated using Rowe scores, Constant scores, redislocation rates, and positive apprehension test rates. Radiographic evaluation was performed using the Samilson-Prieto classification to observe the development of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 41.1±10.4 (range, 30 to 60) months in Group A, and 39.6±9.4 (range, 28 to 60) months in Group B, with no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.559). No significant difference was observed between Group A and Group B in terms of mean Rowe score (89.2±13.8 [range, 40 to 100] vs. 88.7±16.9 [range, 25 to 100]; p=0.895) or Constant score (87.2±8.9 [range, 48 to 96] vs. 86.9±9.0 [range, 46 to 96]; p=0.878), which were the clinical outcomes at the final follow-up examination. Postoperative redislocation rates (3.1% vs. 2.9%, p=1.0) and positive apprehension test rates (6.3% vs. 8.6%, p=1.0) were found to be similar in both groups. According to the Samilson-Prieto classification, there was no evidence of glenohumeral osteoarthritis in any of the patients in either group. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory outcomes were obtained with the use of all-suture anchors in arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. All-suture anchors and metal suture anchors, have similar outcomes in the mid-term and all-suture anchors are a reliable and effective option for arthroscopic Bankart repair.

A comparative study on use of two versus three double-loaded suture anchors in arthroscopic Bankart repair.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare clinical results of repair using two versus three double-loaded suture anchors in arthroscopic Bankart repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2012 and December 2017, a total of 40 patients (38 males, 2 females; mean age: 31.6±8.1; range: 17 to 47 years) who underwent Bankart arthroscopic surgery and were followed for minimum two years were retrospectively analyzed. Group 1 (n=17) underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with two double-loaded suture anchors, while Group 2 (n=23) underwent repair with three double-loaded suture anchors. Clinical outcomes of the patients and recurrences were compared. RESULTS: At the final postoperative follow-up, a significant improvement was observed in the functional outcomes in all patients. No statistically significant difference was found (p>0.05) in the mean clinical scores of the Constant Shoulder Score between Group 1 (94.2±7.8) and Group 2 (95.4±4.1). There was no significant difference in the mean Rowe scores (Group 1: 95.6±4.6 vs. Group 2: 96.3±3.8, respectively) and external rotation loss (at neutral Group 1: 1.9° vs. Group 2: 2.2°, respectively). Three of our patients had recurrent dislocation during a major traumatic event (n=2 in Group 1 and n=1 in Group 2). CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that stability is not correlated with the use of either two versus three double-loaded suture anchors in arthroscopic Bankart repairs.

Effects of shoulder distraction on canine shoulder arthroscopy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of the Leipzig distractor during canine shoulder arthroscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental, ex vivo. SAMPLE POPULATION: Paired shoulder joints from 15 large breed canine cadavers. METHODS: Standard lateral shoulder arthroscopy was performed with or without the use of the Leipzig distractor (n = 15 each). Joint space width, procedure time, and visibility and palpability of the intra-articular structures were assessed during the arthroscopy. After the arthroscopic evaluation, each shoulder joint was disarticulated to assess the area and number of iatrogenic articular cartilage injury (IACI) lesions. Sites around the distraction device were assessed for the presence of iatrogenic injury. RESULTS: With shoulder distraction, median joint space width was 4 mm larger (P = .01), IACI area was 9.5 mm2 lower (P = .003), and there were two fewer total number of IACI lesions (P = .004) compared with nondistracted shoulders. The mean total surgery time was 93 seconds shorter (P = .01) in distracted shoulders. Although distraction was associated with increased visibility of the supraglenoid tubercle (P = .015), no significant differences were found for other intra-articular structures for their visibility and palpability. Unexpected lesions at the sites around the distraction device were not encountered. CONCLUSION: Use of the distraction device decreased the area and incidence of IACI lesions and shortened the arthroscopy time. However, no improvement was found in the visibility or palpability of the intra-articular structures. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Although additional clinical studies are required to evaluate the effect of the distraction device on pathologic articular conditions and intraoperative manipulation, the use of a shoulder distraction device might improve the outcomes of shoulder arthroscopy by decreasing IACI and arthroscopy time.

Diagnostic needle arthroscopy of the scapulohumeral joint in standing sedated horses.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the technique to perform diagnostic standing scapulohumeral joint needle arthroscopy with a 1.2-mm-diameter arthroscope in horses. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study. ANIMALS: Eight thoracic limbs in phase 1 and six horses in phase 2. METHODS: In phase 1, the feasibility of the technique was evaluated by using a craniolateral arthroscopic approach. An evaluation of the visible structures of the scapulohumeral joint was performed with both a needle arthroscope and a 4-mm-diameter arthroscope. In phase 2, the technique was performed in six healthy sedated horses to validate the technique in live animals and to report any complications or limitations. RESULTS: In phase 1, joint evaluation was similar between arthroscopes and allowed complete evaluation of approximately the lateral half of the humeral head and the lateral glenoid rim. In phase 2, all joints were successfully accessed, and fluid extravasation was mild. Arthroscopic visualization was complete for the centrolateral aspect of the joint in all horses and either complete (3/6) or partial (3/6) for the craniolateral and caudolateral structures, respectively. The procedure was rapidly performed and well tolerated, and no postoperative complications occurred. CONCLUSION: The described technique was simple and allowed direct inspection of the scapulohumeral joint. Nonetheless, the standing nature of the technique prevents evaluation of the medial aspect of the humeral head and most of the glenoid cavity. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Needle arthroscopy of the scapulohumeral joint is feasible in horses and offers a diagnostic technique that may improve the surgeon's diagnostic ability for certain shoulder pathologies.

Mobility Assessment of the Supraspinatus in a Porcine Cadaver Model Using a Sensor-Enhanced, Arthroscopic Grasper.

Tendon mobility is highly relevant in rotator cuff surgery. Objective data about rotator cuff mobility is rare. Tendon mobility still needs to be evaluated subjectively by the surgeon. This study aims to establish a porcine animal model for mobility analysis of the supraspinatus. In this context, we introduce a sensor-enhanced, arthroscopic grasper (SEAG) suitable for objective intraoperative measurements of tendon mobility in clinical praxis. Tendon mobility of 15 fresh porcine cadaver shoulders with artificial rotator cuff tears was evaluated using the SEAG. Mobility characteristics (load-displacement curves, maximum load, stiffness) were studied and inter- and intraobserver agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)) were tested. Factors with a potential adverse effect (plastic deformation and rigor mortis) were also evaluated. All shoulders showed characteristic reproducible load-displacement curves with a nonlinear part at the start, followed by a linear part. Mean maximum load was 28.6 N ± 12.5. Mean stiffness was 6.0 N/mm ± 2.6. We found substantial interobserver agreement (ICC 0.672) and nearly perfect intraobserver agreement (0.944) for maximum load measurement. Inter- (0.021) and intraobserver (0.774) agreement for stiffness was lower. Plastic deformation and rigor mortis were excluded. The animal model demonstrates reliable and in vivo-like measurements of tendon mobility. The SEAG is a reliable tool for tendon mobility assessment.

Postoperative bone marrow edema lasts no more than 6 months after uncomplicated arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair with PEEK anchors.

PURPOSE: To assess the natural evolution of the osseous reaction following arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair with PEEK anchors and to analyze its correlation with clinical shoulder function. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2017, 159 patients received arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair with PEEK anchors and underwent serial clinical and radiological follow-up (3, 6, 12, and 24 months). Radiological results were analyzed by tendon integrity, bone marrow edema, and peri-implant osteolysis. Clinical shoulder function was evaluated with the Constant score. RESULTS: One-hundred and seventeen patients were enrolled; among them, 63% demonstrated bone marrow edema around the anchors on postoperative 3-month MRI. The edema area percentage was 41% ± 7%. At 6 months, edema was only seen in 12% of cases, with an area percentage of 18% ± 5%. At 12 and 24 months, edema was rarely present. Fluid signals around the anchor were observed in 17.6%, 42.7%, 33.3%, and 21.0% of patients at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively; the tunnel widening values were 1.1 ± 0.4 mm, 1.8 ± 0.5 mm, 2.3 ± 0.6 mm, and 2.2 ± 0.7 mm at each follow-up, respectively. The sign of osteolysis was significantly more obvious around the lateral anchor than around the medial anchor. The presence of an osseous reaction was not correlated with worse clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: Osseous reactions following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair are common and significant even with PEEK anchors. Bone marrow edema does not last more than 6 months in patients without complications. Peri-implant osteolysis is more evident around the lateral anchor than around the medial anchor and improves gradually over time. The sign of osteolysis is not correlated with clinical shoulder function. Based on these findings, surgeons should be cautious about bone marrow edema lasting more than 6 months following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Novel and reproducible technique coping with intraoperative anchor pullout during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of intraoperative anchor pullout during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, to compare the outcomes of different methods of managing anchor pullout, and to introduce a new technique for anchor pullout. METHODS: 1076 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a single-row repair technique were included. In 483 patients, rotator cuff repair was performed using a screw-in type anchor, and in 593 patients, soft anchors were used. When intraoperative anchor pullout occurred, it was managed by buddy screwing, anchor insertion in a different location, cement augmentation, or by bar anchoring using a threaded Steinmann pin. Plain radiography and sonography were used to check anchor locations and healing. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients experienced anchor pullout intra- or postoperatively (48 and four patients, respectively). Anchor pullouts were more frequently observed for larger tears, women, older patients, and in patients with preoperative stiffness (limitations of both active and passive movements of the affected shoulder joint). For screw-in type anchors, pullout during surgery occurred in 16 patients (3.3%, 16/483), and all were managed using the buddy screwing technique. For soft anchor cases, pullout occurred in 32 patients (5.4%, 32/593) and was managed by anchor insertion in a different location (17 patients), cement augmentation (two patients), or bar anchoring using a threaded Steinmann pin (13 patients). Three patients managed by buddy screwing and two patients managed by anchor insertion in a different location had anchor failure after repair. Tendon healing at 6 months was observed in 12/16 patients treated by buddy screwing, 11/17 treated by anchor insertion in a different location, 2/2 treated by cement augmentation, and 12/13 treated by bar anchoring with a threaded Steinmann pin. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative anchor pullout during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is an uncommon but cumbersome complication. There are some techniques already introduced to deal with this complication. In comparison, not one technique is overwhelmingly superior to others; however, our new technique which is bar anchoring with a threaded Steinmann pin could be another solution, since it could utilize primary anchor sites and results appear to be acceptable. Level of evidence III.

The Efficacy of Arthroscopic Simulation Training on Clinical Ability: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of arthroscopic simulator training on technical performance in a human model. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Literature searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were conducted using combinations of the terms virtual, digital, computer, reality, simulation, arthroscopy, training, learning, and education. Studies were considered for inclusion if they tested the effect of arthroscopic simulator training in a randomized controlled fashion, performed testing in a cadaver or live patient, and used explicit outcome measures of technical skill. Data from studies were extracted and study characteristics and outcomes were reviewed. The primary outcome measure was the number of studies in which the simulation trained group had significantly improved performance results relative to the control group in ≥50% of all measured outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane's Collaboration Tool. RESULTS: Twelve studies, including 340 total study participants, were included for review. Eight studies showed improved performance of the simulation trained group relative to the control group in ≥50% of assessed outcomes. Six of ten studies reporting completion time, three of six studies reporting task checklist completion, 3 of 7 studies reporting global rating scales, and 1 of 4 studies reporting Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool scores showed improved performance of the simulation group relative to the control group for the respective outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: The literature is limited due to heterogeneity, both in type and merit, of the outcome measures that have been used to assess the transfer validity of arthroscopic simulator training to clinical performance. Despite the limitations of the literature, this review demonstrates that arthroscopic simulator training has potential to improve clinical performance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, systematic review of Level II studies.

Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

PURPOSE: To systematically review the outcomes of surgical treatments of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. METHODS: Studies were identified by electronic databases (Ovid, PubMed). All studies reporting functional and radiological outcomes of surgical treatments of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations were included. Following data were extracted: authors and year, study design, level of evidence, number of patients, age, classification of acromioclavicular joint dislocation, time to surgery, surgical technique, follow-up, clinical and imaging outcomes, complications, and failures. Descriptive statistics was used, when a data pooling was not possible. Comparable outcomes were pooled to generate summary outcomes reported as frequency-weighted values. Quality appraisal was assessed through the MINORS checklist. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three studies were included for a total of 4473 shoulders. Mean age of participants was 36.9 years. Mean follow-up was 42.06 months. Arthroscopy showed better ASES (p < 0.0001) and lower VAS pain score (p = 0.0249) compared to an open approach. Biologic and synthetic reconstructions demonstrated better results over osteosynthesis techniques. Biologic techniques showed overall better Constant (p = 0.0001) and DASH (p = 0.0215) scores, while synthetic reconstruction showed better UCLA score (p = 0.0001). Among suture buttons, triple button showed overall better results in Constant (p = 0.0001) and VAS (p = 0.0001) scores, while better results in DASH score (p = 0.0003) were achieved by 2 double button techniques. Overall, the level of evidence was low. CONCLUSION: Biological and synthetic reconstructions achieved better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis. Among suture buttons, the triple button showed better functional performance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Arthroscopic Bankart repair with all-suture anchors does not cause important glenoid bone osteolysis: a volumetric CT study of 143 anchors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate with computed tomography (CT) the incidence of anchor-related osteolysis after implantation of two types of all-suture anchors for the management of labral lesions in shoulder instability. METHODS: Single-cohort, observational study with 12-month follow-up. Thirty-three participants (27 males/6 females; age 38.3 years [SD 11.3]) with anterior labral lesions in which 143 all-suture anchors (71 Iconix 1.4 mm and 72 Suturefix 1.7 mm) were implanted were evaluated with a CT performed a mean of 15.4 [3.85] months after surgery. The volume of the bone defects was measured in the CT. Every anchor was classified into one of four groups: (1) no bone defect. (2) Partial bone defect (defects smaller than the drill used for anchor placement). (3) Tunnel enlargement (defects larger than the drill volume but smaller than twice that volume). (4) Cystic lesion (defects larger than twice the drill volume). RESULTS: No bone defect was identified in 16 anchors (11.2%, [95% CI 6.5-17.5%]). A partial bone defect was found in 84 anchors (58.7% [50.2-66.9%]). Tunnel enlargement was found in 43 anchors (30.11% [22.6-37.6%]). No anchor caused cystic lesions (0% [0-2.5%]). The defect volume was a mean of 27.8 mm3 (SD 18.4 mm3, minimum 0 mm3, maximum 94 mm3). Neither the position in the glenoid nor the type of implant used had a significant effect in the type or size of the defects. CONCLUSION: When using all-suture anchors in the glenoid during instability surgery, relevant bone osteolytic defects are rare at 1-year follow-up. Most anchor insertion tunnels will fill completely (11%) or partially (59%) with bone. Tunnel enlargement will develop in 30% of anchors. No cystic defects larger than 0.125 cm3 were observed. There is a low risk that all-suture anchors cause significant osteolytic bone defects in the glenoid. These implants can be used safely. Level of evidence IV.

Use of External Fixators as a 3-Dimensional Navigation Drill Guide for Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis.

In this article, we describe a novel technique using external fixators and cannulated screws to construct a 3-dimensional navigation drill guide to predict the screw trajectory before screw insertion that can prevent screw collision during arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Four orthopedic residents who had no prior experience of ankle arthrodesis were instructed on how to use the 3-dimensional navigation drill guide and where to insert the screws for ankle arthrodesis. Each resident inserted 6.5 cannulated screws on 8 sawbone ankle models using the device and the C-arm fluoroscopy. An experienced attending surgeon also inserted the same screws on 2 sawbone ankle models to find out if there is any difference between the experienced and inexperienced surgeons. All four residents and an attending surgeon did not experience any collision of screws for the three cannulated screws. Notably, one resident had collision of the 4th screw on his first sawbone model. On the second saw bone model, all surgeons could insert 5 screws without redrilling. A 3-dimensional navigation drill guide constructed with external fixators can assist surgeons in implementing percutaneous screws for arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis.

Accuracy of arthroscopic fluid pump systems in shoulder surgery: a comparison of 3 different pump systems.

BACKGROUND: Extra-articular fluid extravasation is a known complication during shoulder arthroscopy. The risk and amount of extravasation to a large degree is dependent on the fluid pressure delivered to the surgical site. Accurate measurement, knowledge, and control of the pressure delivered is thus important to surgeons, anesthetists, and the patient. The purpose of this study was to compare the pressure measurement accuracy of 3 arthroscopic fluid pumps, with 2 of them having 2 different settings. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (n = 5 per group) undergoing shoulder arthroscopy were selected. Three different arthroscopic fluid pumps (ConMed 24K, Stryker Crossflow, Arthrex Dual Wave) were tested in 5 different operational settings (Stryker, standard and dynamic mode; ConMed, with and without TIPS; Arthrex Dual Wave). In each operation, the set pump pressures and the subsequently delivered intra-articular surgical site fluid pressures were measured by a spinal needle connected to an anesthetic standard pressure transducer attached to the anesthetic machine. Independent measures of the surgical site pressures were obtained before multiple portals were created or extravasation had occurred. Measurements were taken at the beginning of surgery. RESULTS: Measurements of the mean intra-articular pressure were found to not be significantly different from the set pressure for the ConMed 24K with TIPS (0.98 ± 0.02-fold) and Stryker Crossflow in standard mode (0.98 ± 0.02-fold). However, actual pressure was significantly greater than the set pressure for the ConMed 24K without TIPS (by 1.30 ± 0.13-fold), Stryker Crossflow in dynamic mode (by 1.82 ± 0.08-fold), and Arthrex Dual Wave (by 2.19 ± 0.06-fold). CONCLUSION: Independently measured intra-articular pressure can be more than double the set pressure for some arthroscopic pumps. Measuring intra-articular pressure can thus aid in adjusting the set pressure. This could minimize the risk of intraoperative complications.

Arthroscopic-assisted Fixation of a Nonunited Coronoid Stress Fracture in a Competitive Gymnast: A Case Report.

CASE: Gymnasts may suffer elbow injuries due to repetitive loading. However, coronoid stress fractures remain uncommon. We report a case of a high-level female competitive gymnast with a nondisplaced coronoid stress fracture that failed to heal with conservative management. Arthroscopic-assisted in situ fixation of the coronoid nonunion was performed, and the gymnast returned to competition after the fracture healed. CONCLUSION: Coronoid stress fractures should be considered in gymnasts presenting with chronic elbow pain. If nonoperative treatment is unsuccessful, arthroscopic fixation can be successful in stimulating healing of the nonunion without the morbidity of an open approach or bone grafting.